weird is good

Strangest thing. I’ve been shooting photos since about the Triassic period and in all that time I very rarely shot photos in portrait orientation. Well, I mean, except when I was shooting actual portraits, of course. Landscape orientation has always seemed more natural and organic to me.

But since I’ve been using this Ricoh GR3X, I find myself shooting more shots in portrait style. I really can’t explain it. Is it because the camera is so small and light that I’m more willing to turn it on its side? That doesn’t make much sense to me, because I tend to pre-visualize almost all of my shots. I generally ‘see’ them before I shoot them. So why would the camera matter? Maybe it’s the fixed lens? I don’t know.

Or maybe I’m just ‘seeing’ more portrait-oriented shots? Maybe it’s just a coincidence that I’ve started doing that shortly after picking up a new camera? That seems improbable too. Doesn’t it?

Another thing. I’m not entirely sure this is true, but it seems like when I shoot something in portrait orientation, I pay closer attention to the edges of the frame. I like to think I do that with most shots, but I find myself actively thinking about the edges when I’m shooting in portrait. Maybe that’s just because I’m not used to it? Maybe I do it so automatically in landscape orientation that I just don’t notice it as much? That seems possible.

Take this photo, for example. I wanted that tiny bit of chimney in the upper right. And that sliver of the window frame on the left side. And along the bottom, that white line of the parking strip and the blob of shadow from a parked car. I wanted those things, but I didn’t want very much of them. Which, because the GR3 has a fixed lens, meant stepping forward just an inch or two, then stepping back half an inch. It meant doing the goddamn hokey-pokey in the middle of the street until I had it just right.

When I got home and downloaded the photos, I noticed that of the 24 photos I shot during that brief photo-walk, 7 of them were in portrait orientation. Seven. Almost a third of the photos. I’ve never in my life done anything like that.

It doesn’t bother me. It’s just a bit of a shock. Has this happened to anybody else? Have you suddenly found yourself shooting in a different orientation? Or have I maybe had a stroke and just failed to notice it? Maybe it’s a tumor. I don’t know. All I know is that it’s weird.

Happily, I believe weird is good.

7 thoughts on “weird is good

  1. I tend to take a landscape and a portrait version of every photograph I make, no matter the camera or device used, so I’ve been mixing it up. I’ve also found myself to shoot a few extreme Dutch angles of shots as I weave between orientations. I tend to have far too many shots of everything I shoot.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I’m a fairly parsimonious photographer. I don’t shoot a lot of photos, but I tend to be very deliberate about them. I’m sure it’s an artefact of learning to shoot with film, which when I started shooting photos, was expensive to buy and process.

      That said, I do occasionally shoot more than one frame of a subject. It’s probably wise to take several shots, but nobody has ever accused me of wisdom.

      Like

    • It sounds like a LOT more work than it is. One of the benefits of shooting photos for a million years is that a lot of the thought behind any composition has become almost like habit. It’s like the eye remembers before the brain does.

      Like

  2. You scared me for a moment Greg…..these days I relate “weird” to the Trump/Vance campaign. But yeah….the increase in use of portrait mode is weird….in an okay way.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment