in which I look at an old photo

Here’s a thing I’m going to do. Well, it’s a thing I’m thinking I might do. I’m not going to commit to actually doing it because it might be awful–for me and for any poor bastard reading this blog. Anyway, here’s the thing:

I’m thinking I might periodically look at one of my old photos and review or analyze it as if it were shot by a stranger.

I almost never look at my old photos. The very idea of looking at my old photos sounds boring as fuck. The idea of talking about one of my own photos sounds pretentious and annoying (and also boring as fuck). So why am I going to do this? I’ll explain the reasons later. Anyway, here’s the first photo I’ve chosen for this maybe-project.

5:51 PM, Wednesday, September 27, 2006

I shot this one late afternoon in September of 2006 (EXIF data is handy) with my very first digital camera, an Olympus C-770 UZ. A four megapixel powerhouse. It’s shot in a 4:3 aspect ratio, which I’ve never been comfortable with. As I recall, there was an option to shoot in 3:2, but it required some loss in resolution, which was noticeable in a 4mp camera.

I was having coffee with a friend and was somewhat distracted by the pattern of the late afternoon shadows. I recall shooting a couple frames of the shadows, but the images weren’t very interesting. At some point, my friend raised her arm to sip her coffee; the sun had shifted enough to illuminate the edge of the rolled up sleeve of her white shirt. I asked her to do it again and took the shot.

It’s not a great photograph, but that arm and sleeve humanizes the image. It’s not just a photo of some shadows; it’s a photo of a human moment. There’s a palpable mood here–quiet, reflective, casual, conversational. There’s something comfortably relaxed, intimate even, about that rolled up sleeve. I also like the fact that the image is intimate while being sort of impersonal; there’s almost nothing to identify the other person–age, gender, height, weight. It could be anybody. Fill in the blank.

Finally, the perspective puts the viewer IN the scene. Sitting relaxed across at a table with a friend in an almost empty coffee shop on a sunny afternoon.

Okay. Now, why am I talking about this 18-year-old photo? Here’s why.

I used to spend a lot of time thinking about photography. Thinking about different photographers, about styles and trends in photography, about the decision-making processes involved in making photos. For years I wrote a fairly regular series of essays about photographers (which can be found here). I started those essays primarily as a way to educate myself, but they became a tool for discussion in a Flickr group called Utata.

And then I stopped. I could probably cobble together some logical explanation for why I stopped, but really, who cares? The thing is, I just didn’t spend much time thinking about photography and photographers. I continued to shoot photographs, but lackadaisically and rarely with an actual camera. I was satisfied with my Pixel phone. Until a few months ago.

Again, I could probably cobble together some logical explanation for why I picked up a 12-year-old camera, but, again, who cares? I picked it up and started shooting with a camera again. Which led me to start shooting with another of my cameras. Which led me to decide to buy a new camera (which should arrive in a month or so). I’ll write about the new camera when it arrives. But the thing is, I’m thinking about photography again. I’m reading about photography again. And one of the articles I read included some bullshit about reviewing your old photographs.

Here’s a True Thing: I have no real interest in looking at my old photos. The very idea of looking at my old photos sounds boring as fuck. I mean, I shot those photos; I’ve already seen them. I’d rather look at new photos, photos shot by somebody else.

But this article suggested looking at your old photos as if they were made by a different person. The rationale is that we change over time, so our approach to photography probably changes. Which sorta kinda makes sense to me, since in a very real way I’m NOT the same person I was in, say, 2006.

So I said, “What the hell, why not?” and I opened up Google Photos and scrolled all the way down to the oldest photos. The photo above was one of them. It seemed like a good place to start.

I don’t know if this is a good idea or not. I’m not sure I’ll follow through on it. But back in the days when I was actively thinking about photography, I stumbled across some thoughts by Alfred Stieglitz and William Gedney about practicing in public. Although they didn’t put it quite like this, those guys were suggesting that if you’re serious about photography, you’ve got to be willing show your whole ass. Maybe this is related to that whole notion.

11 thoughts on “in which I look at an old photo

  1. I look at my old photographs all the time. I have taken so many that I know I didn’t give many of them the proper scrutiny the first time around. Also… my editing techniques have improved probably ten-fold. Maybe more. My ideas with regard to image processing have changed considerably since then, too, and I have—from time to time—decided that I liked an image enough that it deserved a different sort of presentation.

    Some of my dearest photos were taken before I actually knew what I was doing with a camera, particularly the digital kind, so I revisit the old photos not only for the reasons I mentioned above, but to reconnect a little bit with the person that took them. If that makes even the slightest bit of sense or isn’t too highfalutin.

    Idiot that I am, I just started a new Substack blog on which I intend to post photos + words, although I don’t intend on getting technical (speaking of boring!) unless it absolutely has to be done for one reason or another, and by that I mean probably never. I’m not sure which direction the thing will take, but I have a feeling I’ll be sifting through old photos for the purpose of finding words.

    Like

    • I think a lot of photographers look at their old photos. Maybe most. And I’m told a lot of writers re-read their old work. I’ve just never felt any desire or interest in doing that.

      That business about reconnecting “with the person that took them,” makes sense to me when I apply it to other people. When I did the Sunday Salons, I was always intrigued by how photographers would change through the years.

      That said, I was surprised by how well I remembered the moment I took the photo in the blog post. It was like one of those Proust-madeleine moments. So there may actually be some benefit to looking at old photos.

      When you get your substack going, let me know. (Although there’s that whole Substack/Nazi thing taking place, which makes the platform sort of unpalatable at the moment.)

      Like

    • That’s the thing, isn’t it. Something catches the light, or something slides into shadow, and for just a tiny moment there’s something special and beautiful…and then it’s gone.

      You can tell people about it (“Why are you grinning?” “Sunlight illuminated your sleeve.”) and most of them will look at you like you’re on drugs.

      Like

  2. Pingback: in which I look at an old photo (part 2) | gregfallis.com

  3. Pingback: in which I look at an old photo (part 3) | gregfallis.com

  4. Pingback: in which I look at an old photo (part 4) | gregfallis.com

  5. Pingback: in which I look at an old photo (part 5) | gregfallis.com

  6. Pingback: in which I look at an old photo (part 6) | gregfallis.com

  7. Pingback: in which i look at an old photo (part7) | gregfallis.com

  8. Pingback: in which i look at an old photo (part 8) | gregfallis.com

Leave a reply to patrick Cancel reply